|
Post by Adurûth on Jul 25, 2005 23:36:54 GMT
Hmph. Since there is no pvp, what do you think will be one of the most important aspects of this game? If I had to chose I'd probably say stealth and ranged attacks(not necessarily bows.)
|
|
|
Post by Elindir on Jul 27, 2005 18:12:20 GMT
I would say pvp was the least needed aspect to start with For me it is going to be the ability to work in a team, work together with people I know. That, and being immersed in the world I love ;D
|
|
|
Post by Tali on Aug 4, 2005 3:22:54 GMT
I would have to say immersion, realism, and something to keep me interested in the game, i.e. as little as possible grinding for experience!
|
|
|
Post by Adurûth on Aug 4, 2005 3:58:30 GMT
I like that Eli, I'd love to see working as a team. How do you think we all will play together though, what I mean is that, like if we are both playing at the same time, will we be at the same place, and we can't go any further until the other player moves?
|
|
|
Post by Tali on Aug 5, 2005 1:49:17 GMT
No, we'll all be separate and free to go where we want. We'll probably be able to form a party of 5 or 6 members though to travel with, distribute experience and treasures between, hunt, and clear dungeons.
|
|
|
Post by Adurûth on Aug 5, 2005 15:09:14 GMT
That would be pretty cool, I just hope the experience would be like (lets say if your by yourself, no kinship, and you kill a monster worth 1000 points) I hope if we have 5 people in the kinship we each get 1000 exp. not 200. You know what I mean?
|
|
|
Post by Tali on Aug 8, 2005 12:39:21 GMT
That doesn't make sense, because you're getting the help of others to bring down the monster faster than you would bring it down by yourself. There has to be some kind of exp. restraint when in parties. Sometimes they give the monster bonus exp. when you're with a group before they split the exp. between the members.
The point is, with a group you can take down monsters a lot faster than solo, so you need to gain less exp. per monster than you would solo.
I do agree, though, that they should make it more worthwhile to be with a group than alone.
|
|
|
Post by Adurûth on Aug 8, 2005 21:15:52 GMT
Agreed, I wonder what's the largest group number that can travel together? I mean I'd like to be in a 3 person group(me, player2, player3.) But I would like to see a group the size of the fellowship, eventually. But no more than 9. I have a question, what do you think is the best 3 team combo? I'd say man, elf, and dwarf. (maybe replace the dwarf with either a man or elf, it depends.) Don't get me wrong I like hobbits, but I don't think I know anyone being a hobbit as of now.
|
|
|
Post by abarsai on Sept 27, 2005 15:40:15 GMT
Well, working together as a team is tons of fun and I know from previous games like BF2 and BF1942 that when using a voicechat program to talk to each other within the game adds a huge amount to the game. Just being able to hang out together also helps how well the team responds together and it becomes like playing with best friends! As for the hobbit, my Kinship has one, lol. They will be an....interesting race, lol.
|
|
|
Post by Adurûth on Sept 27, 2005 22:44:21 GMT
Yes, if it's like Bf1942 (Which I highly doubt). The voice "Simulators/translators," would be outstanding. (BF1942= battle-field 1942 ) -Just a quick question, Abasaria....(Sorry for the spelling, of your name). Are you joining CoP, or just stopping every once in a while to say "hey." (There is no reason why I'm asking, just curious.)
|
|